Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear talks with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.
Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed recent overtures had come from go-betweens to reopen talks with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.
Araghchi is treading a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.
He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the prior discussions.
The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president asserting the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries employed their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.
Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.
It had not been decided in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials asserted three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".
Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.
The US president in recent days claimed he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats state they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.
In his address to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of global regulations, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a truce.
Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust hard to restore.
The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had always sought to dictate their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be adhered to."
"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the identical language."
In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."
He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the face of this assault."
AI strategist and data scientist with over a decade of experience in implementing scalable machine learning systems for enterprises.